Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv80710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Saint-Fleur v. Wilmarth et al
as 5:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Franck Saint-Fleur
Defendant:
C. Wilmarth, T. Albertson, G. Inman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Andrews v. Tucker et al
as 3:2022cv01079
Plaintiff:
Byron Andrews
Defendant:
J.L. Tucker, Albertson, Mckennzey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albertson v. Thompson et al
as 4:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
Gordon Kirk Albertson
Defendant:
Don Thompson, Detective Murry, Detective Dalton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albertson v. Thompson et al
as 4:2021cv00248
Plaintiff:
Gordon Kirk Albertson
Defendant:
Don Thompson, Detective Murry, Numerous Officers of the Drug Task Force and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albertson v. Thompson et al
as 4:2021cv00247
Plaintiff:
Gordon Kirk Albertson
Defendant:
Don Thompson and Walker County Jail Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albertson v. Murry et al
as 4:2021cv00246
Plaintiff:
Gordon Kirk Albertson
Defendant:
Detective Murry, Detective Dalton and Detective Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albertson v. State of Georgia et al
as 4:2021cv00237
Plaintiff:
Gordon Kirk Albertson
Defendant:
State of Georgia and Walker County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albertson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2017cv01954
Petitioner:
Allen Scott Albertson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Charles Horton v. Nicholas Degennaro, et al
as 14-10796
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES HORTON
Defendant - Appellee:
NICHOLAS DEGENNARO, AFT Agent, CHARLES SEDBERRY, AFT Agent, DAVID BENEFIELD, Cherokee Gunn/Pawn and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
