Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Michael Selvie v. Mohammed Siddiqui, et al
as 22-2970
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL SELVIE
Defendant / Appellee:
MOHAMMED SIDDIQUI, Medical Director, Menard CC, JOHN TROST, Doctor, Doctor/Medical Director, Menard CC, STEPHEN RITZ, Physician, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Caleb Charleston v. Alex Jones, et al
as 22-2676
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALEB CHARLESTON
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX JONES, TANGELA OLIVER, Mental Health Staff, Menard CC, JOSHUA SCHOENBECK, Correctional Officer and others
Njie v. Jones et al
as 3:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
Adama Njie
Defendant:
Alex Jones, Anthony Wills, C/O Lauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01454
Plaintiff:
Shung Moore
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Dr. Siddiqui, Reva Engelage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corrie Wallace, et al v. John Baldwin, et al
as 21-1883
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFERY HUTCHINSON, Warden, ROB JEFFREYS, JACQUELINE LASHBROOK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAFAEL E. SANTOS, JR. and CORRIE WALLACE
Ronnie Ward v. Alex Jones
as 21-1654
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONNIE WARD
Respondent / Appellee:
ALEX JONES, Acting Warden, Menard Correctional Center
Moore v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2020cv01286
Defendant:
Bill Westfall, Anthony Wills, Alex Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Youngblood v. John Trost, et al
as 20-2968
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN TROST, Doctor, Medical Director at Menard, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., ALEX JONES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY L. YOUNGBLOOD
Robert Chapman v. Anthony Wills
as 20-2735
Respondent / Appellee:
ALEX JONES and ANTHONY WILLS
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT J. CHAPMAN
Demetrus Cole v. Alex Jones
as 20-1893
Respondent / Appellee:
ALEX JONES
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEMETRUS COLE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
