Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Diaz v. Dixon et al
as 3:2023cv01031
Plaintiff:
Ibrain Diaz
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Dortheanne Roberts, Alexis Figueroa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pace v. Llorens et al
as 3:2023cv00965
Plaintiff:
Marvin Pace
Defendant:
A. Llorens, Jessica Putney, David Noles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv01221
Plaintiff:
Elmer Williams
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Centurion of Florida, LLC, MHM Health Professionals, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Larkin L. Derks, III v. Alexis Figueroa
as 22-13202
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARKIN LLOYD DERKS, III
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. ALEXIS FIGUEROA
Phillips v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00997
Plaintiff:
DONNY PHILLIPS
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Centurion, MHM Health Professionals LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00955
Plaintiff:
ELMER WILLIAMS
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, CENTURION, LLC, MHM Health Professionals, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgess v. Hodgson et al
as 3:2022cv00416
Plaintiff:
Jerome Burgess and Sham
Defendant:
Warden Christopher Hodgson, Dr. Alexis Figueroa, Nurse Dunaway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Carpenter et al
as 3:2021cv01034
Plaintiff:
Charlie Vernon Davis
Defendant:
Carpenter, Jenkins, Cannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mikeada Effs v. City of Miami, et al
as 21-11672
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIKEADA EFFS, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEXI FIGUEROA, individually and as a former police officer of the City of Miami Police Department and CITY OF MIAMI, a Florida municipality
FIGUEROA V. SAUL
as 2:2021cv01990
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS FIGUEROA
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
