Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Timothy Wallace v. Ken Paxton, et al
as 18-20445
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY RANDOLPH WALLACE
Defendant - Appellee:
KEN PAXTON, BRAD LIVINGSTON, LEON GUINN and others
Wallace v. Paxton et al
as 4:2016cv02827
Plaintiff:
Timothy Randolph Wallace
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Brad Livingston, Leon Guinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Polunski et al
as 2:2015cv00066
Plaintiff:
Timothy Randolph Wallace
Defendant:
Allan Polunski, Robert Williams and Mark Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Polunski et al
as 2:2015cv00063
Plaintiff:
Timothy Randolph Wallace
Defendant:
Allan Polunski, Robert Williams and Mark Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Churchill Downs Incorporated, et al v. Chuck Trout, et al
as 13-50900
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHURCHILL DOWNS INCORPORATED and CHURCHILL DOWNS TECHNOLOGY INITIATIVES COMPANY, doing business as TwinSpires.Com
Defendant - Appellee:
CHUCK TROUT, In His Official Capacity as Executive Director of the Texas Racing Commission, GARY P. ABER, In His Official Capacity as a Member of the Texas Racing Commission, SUSAN COMBS, in Her Official Capacityas a Member of the Texas Racing Commission and others
Churchill Downs Incorporated v. Trout et al
as 1:2012cv00880
Defendant:
Gary P. Aber, Susan Combs, Ronald F. Ederer and others
Plaintiff:
Churchill Downs Incorporated and Churchill Downs Technology Initiatives Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Timothy Wallace v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 09-20453
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY R WALLACE
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, LEON GUINN, Director, ALLAN POLUNSKI, Chairman and others
Wallace v. Livingston et al
as 4:2009cv01881
Plaintiff:
Timothy Randolph Wallace
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Leon Guinn, Allan Polunski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
