Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 222
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Nathan Gassman, et al
as 23-35567
Plaintiff / Appellee: ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES
Defendant / Appellant: NATHAN GASSMAN, District Ranger, Kootenai National Forest, Libby Ranger District, CHAD BENSON, Forest Supervisor, Kootenai National Forest, KEITH LANNOM, Deputy Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service Region One and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, LINCOLN COUNTY and KOOTENAI FOREST STAKEHOLDERS COALITION
Alliance for the Wild Rockies, et al v. State of Idaho, et al
as 23-35451
Plaintiff / Appellee: ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES and NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS COUNCIL
Defendant: HILARY COOLEY, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Grizzly Bear Recovery Coordinator, MARTHA WILLIAMS, Director, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and DEB HAALAND, Secretary, Department of Interior
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: STATE OF IDAHO
Alliance for the Wild Rockies, et al v. Hilary Cooley, et al
as 23-35436
Plaintiff / Appellee: ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES and NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS COUNCIL
Defendant / Appellant: HILARY COOLEY, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Grizzly Bear Recovery Coordinator, MARTHA WILLIAMS, Director, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and DEB HAALAND, Secretary, Department of Interior
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: STATE OF IDAHO
Wilderness Watch et al v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2023cv00077
Plaintiff: Wilderness Watch, Alliance for the Wild Rockies, Gallatin Wildlife Association and others
Defendant: United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Intervenor Defendant: Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Alliance for the Wild Rockies et al v. United States Forest Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00290
Plaintiff: Alliance for the Wild Rockies and Native Ecosystems Council
Defendant: United States Forest Service, Randy Moore, Carl Petrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Alliance for the Wild Rockies et al v. Kaiser et al
as 9:2023cv00003
Plaintiff: Alliance for the Wild Rockies and Native Ecosystems Council
Defendant: Kirsten Kaiser, Chad Benson, Keith Lannom and others
Intervenor Defendant: Kootenai Tribe of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Alliance for the Wild Rockies et al v. Haaland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00062
Plaintiff: Alliance for the Wild Rockies and Native Ecosystems Council
Defendant: Deb Haaland, Tracy Stone-Manning, Sonya Germann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Western Watersheds Project et al v. Moore et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2022cv00149
Plaintiff: Western Watersheds Project, Alliance for the Wild Rockies, Native Ecosystems Council and others
Defendant: Randy Moore, United States Forest Service, Martha Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-35583
Plaintiff / Appellee: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, CONSERVATION NORTHWEST, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
Defendant / Appellant: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, MARTHA WILLIAMS, Principal Deputy Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, in her official capacity and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: STATE OF IDAHO, by and through the Office of Species Conservation and the Idaho Fish and Game Commission
Native Ecosystems Council, et al v. Keith Lannom, et al
as 22-35496
Plaintiff / Appellee: NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS COUNCIL and ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES
Defendant / Appellant: KEITH LANNOM, U.S. Forest Service Deputy Regional Forester and U.S. FOREST SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?