Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Alonzo McKinney v. Rocha
as 2:2024cv02295
Petitioner:
Alonzo McKinney
Respondent:
Rocha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) McKiney v. Newson
as 2:2024cv00680
Petitioner:
Alonzo McKiney, Alonzo McKinney and Alonso McKiney
Respondent:
Newson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alonzo McKinney v. CDCR, et al
as 23-55321
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALONZO MCKINNEY
Respondent / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Alonzo McKinney v. Newsom
as 2:2023cv01529
Petitioner:
Alonzo McKinney and Gregory Davis
Respondent:
Newsom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) McKinney v. Newsom
as 2:2023cv00300
Petitioner:
Alonzo McKinney and Gregory Davis
Respondent:
Newsom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alonzo McKinney v. Unknown
as 2:2022cv02722
Petitioner:
Alonzo McKinney
Respondent:
Unknown and G. Newsom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alonzo McKinney v. Unknown Defendant
as 2:2021cv04122
Plaintiff:
Alonzo McKinney and Alonso McKiney
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alonzo McKinney v. G. Newsom
as 2:2020cv10736
Petitioner:
Alonzo McKinney
Respondent:
G. Newsom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC) McKinney v. Newson
as 2:2019cv01695
Petitioner:
Alonzo McKinney and Alonso McKiney
Respondent:
G. Newson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alonzo McKinney v. County of Imperial, et al
as 19-55681
Defendant:
KENNETH LALAS, Dr., M. VOONG, J. LEWIS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GILBERT G. OTERO, Supervisor District Attorney, County of Imperial, NAME IN MOTION , Correction Officer, Calipatria State Prison, EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALONZO MCKINNEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
