Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Baja et al v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services et al
as 2:2026cv02830
Plaintiff:
Patrick E Baja and Diana Butnarciuc
Defendant:
U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services and Amanda Haury
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
not used
as 2:2026cv02357
Plaintiff:
Amanda Solinko
Defendant:
Ronald Monroe and Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Monroe et al v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
as 2:2026cv02355
Plaintiff:
Ronald Monroe and Amanda Solinko
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Mohamed Abdalla Mahmoud v. Heather Baca et al
as 2:2026cv02229
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abdalla Mahmoud
Defendant:
Heather Baca, Cano, Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Sankona Graham vs. A Amacker, et al
as 2:2026cv01859
Plaintiff:
Sankona Graham
Defendant:
Amanda Amacker, B. Silber, Estill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01764
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01758
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
