Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv10705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 American With Disabilities Act- Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Schensky v. Medical Depot, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv11395
Plaintiff:
Ronald Schensky
Defendant:
Medical Depot, Inc., d/b/a Drive Medical Design and Manufacturing, Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon.Com Services, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bennett v. Amazon.Com Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv11070
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Bennett
Defendant:
Amazon.Com Services, Inc., Amazon Corporate LLC Group Health and Welfare Plan and The Prudential Insurance Company of America
3Rd Party Defendant:
James A Bennett, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Smith v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC,
as 2:2022cv12747
Plaintiff:
Lane B. Smith
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Northuis v. Amazon.Com Services, LLC
as 1:2022cv00899
Plaintiff:
Marci Northuis
Defendant:
Amazon.Com Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
