Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Anadex Data Communications LLC v. Amcrest Technologies LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01417
Plaintiff:
Anadex Data Communications LLC
Defendant:
Amcrest Technologies LLC and Amcrest Industries LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement
ThroughTEK Co., Ltd. v. Amcrest Technologies, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
ThroughTEK Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Amcrest Technologies, LLC, Amazon.com, Inc., eBay Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
KT Imaging USA, LLC v. Zhejiang Dahua Technology Co., Ltd. et al
as 4:2022cv03440
Plaintiff:
KT Imaging USA, LLC
Defendant:
Zhejiang Dahua Technology Co., Ltd., Zhejiang Dahua Vision Technology Co., Ltd., Dahua Technology (HK) Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Swirlate IP LLC v. Amcrest Technologies LLC
as 4:2022cv02543
Plaintiff:
Swirlate IP LLC
Defendant:
Amcrest Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Portus Singapore Pte Ltd et al v. Amcrest Technologies LLC
as 4:2022cv01973
Plaintiff:
Portus Singapore Pte Ltd and Portus Pty Ltd
Defendant:
Amcrest Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Social Positioning Input Systems, LLC v. Amcrest Technologies, LLC
as 4:2022cv01311
Plaintiff:
Social Positioning Input Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Amcrest Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Benderloch Technologies LLC v. Amcrest Technologies LLC
as 4:2021cv03883
Plaintiff:
Benderloch Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Amcrest Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Moxchange LLC v. Amcrest Technologies LLC
as 4:2020cv03687
Defendant:
Amcrest Technologies LLC
Plaintiff:
Moxchange LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Canatelo, LLC v. Amcrest Technologies LLC
as 3:2015cv02626
Plaintiff:
Canatelo, LLC
Defendant:
Amcrest Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
