Cases 61 - 70 of 79
WILSON et al v. AMERICAN STEAMSHIP COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv37843
Plaintiff:
CHESTER WILSON and CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
AMERICAN STEAMSHIP COMPANY , CARGO SHIPS TANKER, INCORPORATED, EARL J. SMITH COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MCBRIDE et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv91081
Plaintiff:
BERNARD MCBRIDE and JOANN MCBRIDE
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Huffman v. American Steamship Company
as 2:2009cv00028
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Huffman and Phyllis Huffman
Defendant:
American Steamship Company, American Steamship Company and American Steamship Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ahmed v. American Steamship Company
as 1:2009cv00118
Plaintiff:
Kasim Ahmed
Defendant:
American Steamship Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Huffman v. American Steamship Company
as 2:2008cv14959
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Huffman
Defendant:
American Steamship Company
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Sacco v. American Steamship Company
as 2:2008cv14466
Plaintiff:
Joseph Sacco
Defendant:
American Steamship Company
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Aljalham v. American Steamship Company
as 2:2008cv14043
Plaintiff:
Nasser Aljalham
Defendant:
American Steamship Company
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Kowalski v. American Steamship Company
as 1:2008cv13932
Plaintiff:
Anthony Kowalski
Defendant:
American Steamship Company
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Quraish v. American Steamship Company
as 2:2008cv13668
Plaintiff:
Fadel Quraish
Defendant:
American Steamship Company
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Cervo v. American Steamship Company
as 2:2008cv13264
Plaintiff:
Larry Cervo
Defendant:
American Steamship Company
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
