Cases 1 - 9 of 9
AMTEC CORPORATION et al v. NON-LETHAL DEFENSE INC et al
as 4:2015cv00450
Plaintiff:
AMTEC CORPORATION and AMTEC LESS LETHAL SYSTEMS INC
Defendant:
NON-LETHAL DEFENSE INC and DAVE DUBAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company et al v. Behrens et al
as 5:2014cv00478
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and State Farm Florida Insurance Company
Defendant:
Robert E Behrens , Carolyn Grimes and Amtec Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hinkle v. Amtec Corporation
as 5:2013mc00125
Plaintiff:
Shirley J. Hinkle
Defendant:
Amtec Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
AMTEC Corporation v. US Centrifuge Systems LLC et al
as 5:2012cv01874
Plaintiff:
AMTEC Corporation
Defendant:
US Centrifuge Systems LLC, US Innovation Group Inc, Key Environmental Systems Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Grimes v. Amtec Corporation et al
as 5:2012cv01144
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Grimes
Defendant:
Amtec Corporation, Employers Claims Management Inc, US Centrifuge Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Grimes v. Amtec Corporation et al
as 5:2012cv01147
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Grimes
Defendant:
Amtec Corporation, Employers Claims Management Inc, US Centrifuge Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
AMTEC CORPORATION V US
as 06-5086
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Amtec Corporation
Defendant-Appellee:
United States
DSE Inc v. USA, et al
as 98-5265
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DSE, Inc., doing business as Dayron
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, The United States Department of the Army, Louis Caldera, Secretary of the Army and others
Defendant - Terminated Party:
Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of the Army
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
AMTEC Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
