Cases 1 - 10 of 10
King v. Missouri State Public Defender System et al
as 2:2021cv04078
Defendant:
Amy Clay, Missouri State Public Defender System and Mary Fox
Plaintiff:
Matthew J King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. St. Louis County Jail et al
as 4:2011cv00165
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Harris
Defendant:
St. Louis County Jail, State of Missouri, Christopher West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. State of Missouri
as 4:2010cv01762
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Harris
Defendant:
State of Missouri, St. Louis County Jail, Francis Slay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Queener et al
as 4:2010cv01593
Plaintiff:
William G. Carter
Defendant:
Emmett D. Queener, Amy Clay, Ellen Blau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason Hibbard v. Amy Clay
as 10-1917
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jason Hibbard
Defendant - Appellee:
Amy Clay, Missouri Public Defender, Official Capacity
Rushing v. Clay et al
as 4:2010cv00242
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rushing
Defendant:
Amy Clay, Jeff Griffin and Michelle Monahan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hibbard v. Clay
as 2:2010cv00004
Plaintiff:
Jason Hibbard
Defendant:
Amy Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Gormon v. David Dowd, et al
as 09-2183
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John D. Gormon
Defendant - Appellee:
David L. Dowd, Circuit Court Judge, Probate Division, Officially and Individually, Charles S. Birmingham, Assistant Attorney General, Officially and Individually, Theodore A. Bruce, Assistant Attorney General, Officially and Individually and others
Gormon v. Dowd et al
as 4:2009cv00280
Plaintiff:
John D. Gormon
Defendant:
David L. Dowd, Charles S. Birmingham, Theodore A. Bruce and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fogle v. Robinson et al
as 4:2007cv01576
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Fogle
Defendant:
J. Marty Robinson, Michelle Monahan, Eric Selig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
