Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Moreland, Samuel v. Draheim, Sara et al
as 3:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Samuel Moreland
Defendant:
Dr. Sara K. Draheim, Dr. Patricia K. Lis and Dr. Lori J. Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moreland, Samuel v. Bryant et al
as 3:2022cv00679
Plaintiff:
Samuel Moreland
Defendant:
Warden Office Bryant, Dr. Landers, Dr. Zimmerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castellano v. Kuepper et al
as 2:2021cv00962
Plaintiff:
John J Castellano
Defendant:
Ryan Kuepper, Cheryl Eplett, Patricia Lis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spectrum Brands Pet LLC v. LXW, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00473
Plaintiff:
Spectrum Brands Pet LLC
Defendant:
LXW, Inc., Xiaoxiao Li, Shawn Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
United States of America v. Yang, Kao et al
as 3:2020cv00223
Defendant:
Kao Yang and Li Zhang
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Cirves, Elizabeth v. Syed et al
as 3:2019cv00725
Defendant:
Nurse 'Brenda', Dr. Nicole Li, Nurse and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Cirves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NeoCoil LLC v. Estone Group LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00548
Plaintiff:
NeoCoil LLC
Defendant:
Estone Group LLC , Estone Technology Incorporated , Estone Technology Incorporated d/b/a Habey USA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ginseng Board of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Uustar Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00533
Plaintiff:
Ginseng Board of Wisconsin, Inc.
Defendant:
Uustar Corporation, WOHO Natural, Inc., Yanqing Li and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
