Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv61167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero et al v. Werfel et al
as 1:2016cv01109
Defendant:
City of New York, John and Jane Doe 1 through 10 and Emily Werfel
Plaintiff:
Ana Romero and Isaac Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eliazar Santis-Hernandez
as 5:2010mj00229
Material Witne:
Rafael Baines Arrevalo, Elmer Garcia-Tejada, Jayson Saul Claros Gomez and others
Defendant:
Eliazar Santis-Hernandez (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Pedro Domingo Esteban
as 5:2010mj00229
Material Witne:
Rafael Baines Arrevalo, Elmer Garcia-Tejada, Jayson Saul Claros Gomez and others
Defendant:
Pedro Domingo Esteban (3)
Plaintiff:
USA
Mateo Gomez Silvestre
as 5:2010mj00229
Material Witne:
Rafael Baines Arrevalo, Elmer Garcia-Tejada, Jayson Saul Claros Gomez and others
Defendant:
Mateo Gomez Silvestre (2)
Plaintiff:
USA
Pedro Esteban Domingo Francisco
as 5:2010mj00229
Material Witne:
Rafael Baines Arrevalo, Elmer Garcia-Tejada, Jayson Saul Claros Gomez and others
Defendant:
Pedro Esteban Domingo Francisco (4)
Plaintiff:
USA
USA v. Santis-Hernandez et al
as 5:2010mj00229
Material Witne:
Rafael Baines Arrevalo, Elmer Garcia-Tejada, Jayson Saul Claros Gomez and others
Defendant:
Joaquin Castaneda (5), Pedro Domingo Esteban (3), Pedro Esteban Domingo Francisco (4) and others
Plaintiff:
USA
Marco Flores Sanchez, et al v. Michael Mukasey
as 08-73162
Petitioner:
MARCO ANTONIO FLORES SANCHEZ, JESUS ANTONIO FLORES SOTO and ANA ROMERO SOTO
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
