Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Bundy et al v. St. Lukes Health System LTD et al
as 1:2023cv00212
Petitioner:
Ammon Bundy, Ammon Bundy for Governor, Diego Rodriguez and others
Respondent:
St. Lukes Health System LTD
Defendant:
St. Lukes Regional Medical Center LTD, Chris Roth, Natasha Erickson, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Macik v. First Judicial District Court of Idaho et al
as 1:2014cv00378
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Macik
Defendant:
First Judicial District Court of Idaho, Idaho Department of Corrections, Fourth Judicial District of Idaho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIRECTV, LLC v. Valenzuela et al
as 1:2013cv00230
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, LLC
Defendant:
Rick R. Valenzuela Individually, and as officer, director, shareholder, principal, member and/or manager of R&J Restaurants LLC, d/b/a Rick's Press Room Grill & Bar and R & J Restaurants LLC doing business as Rick's Press Room Grill and Bar
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Federal Communications Act of 1934
The Associated Press et al v. Otter et al
as 1:2012cv00255
Plaintiff:
The Associated Press , Idaho Statesman Publishing, LLC , Lee Enterprises, Incorporated and others
Defendant:
C.L. (Butch) Otter , Robin Sandy , Howard G. "J.R.&q Van Tassel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly et al v. Wengler et al
as 1:2011cv00185
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kelly , Jose Pina , Andrew Ibarra and others
Defendant:
Timothy Wengler and Corrections Corporation of America, Inc
Interpleader:
Associated Press, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Press-A-Print International LLC v. Richardson et al
as 4:2009cv00557
Plaintiff:
Press-A-Print International LLC
Defendant:
Tim Richardson, Vince Whaley and Gentleman Business Development, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Case name not on file
as 1:2008mc06420
Movant:
Spokesman-Review, The, Spokesman-Review, The, Associated Press, The and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
