Cases 11 - 20 of 661
Anderson v. Bowers Towing et al.
as 5:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. Anderson
Defendant:
Bowers Towing and Akron Police Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Anderson et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01112
Plaintiff:
Lisa Anderson and James Anderson
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anderson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01092
Plaintiff:
Terry Anderson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Lisa Anderson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Anderson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00989
Plaintiff:
Jon Anderson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anderson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
James E. Anderson
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anderson v. Vandercar et al.
as 5:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. Anderson
Defendant:
Ashley Vandercar and Dr. Zicoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Indivior, Inc. et al
as 1:2024sf65016
Plaintiff:
Ronald Anderson
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Nichols v. Warnecke
as 2:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Randy Dean Nichols
Defendant:
John Michael Warnecke, Mathew Ellis, Adam Rummer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
