Cases 1 - 10 of 47
IMO The Supervised Administration of the Estate of Robert L Anderson Deceased
as 1:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Department of Veterans Affairs
Defendant:
In Re: the Estate of Robert L. Anderson, Deceased Personal Representative Mulvaney, Loa J., United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Carmen Anderson and others
Other:
IMO Supervised Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
HANAFI v. UETSA TSAKITS, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv01765
Plaintiff:
Mary Hanafi
Defendant:
Uetsa Tsakits, Inc. doing business as MaxLend, David Johnson, Kirk Michael Chewning and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
LEMMONS v. MAKES CENTS, INC. d/b/a MAXLEND et al
as 1:2022cv01455
Plaintiff:
Lindzy Lemmons
Defendant:
Makes Cents, Inc., dba MaxLend, Uetsa Tsakits, Inc., David Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00216
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
IMO 2019 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 2:2019mc00090
In Re:
Danuta B. Panich, Kenneth L. Sales, Scott J. Lennox and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02176
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02906
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
