Cases 81 - 90 of 516
Anderson v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2022cv00758
Plaintiff:
Serena anderson
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, General R.V. Center, Inc. and REV Recreation Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Arroyo v. Vergakis et al
as 2:2022cv00505
Plaintiff:
Amos Arroyo
Defendant:
John Vergakis, John Doe, John Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Mathena, et al
as 7:2022cv00701
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Shelton
Defendant:
Rector, Tracy Mathena, Tim Hamm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Anderson, et al
as 7:2022cv00699
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Shelton
Defendant:
David Anderson, Tracy Mathena, Sgt. J. Coe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Wang
as 7:2022cv00655
Plaintiff:
William L. Anderson
Defendant:
Dr. Wang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Springer v. Anderson et al
as 7:2022cv00663
Plaintiff:
Levi G. Springer
Defendant:
Warden David E. Anderson, Assistant Warden Joseph D. Bateman, Chief of Security Howard Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shakur v. Sherwood et al
as 7:2022cv00645
Plaintiff:
Shaka Shakur
Defendant:
Sherwood, M. Breniger, May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowser v. Anderson
as 1:2022cv01247
Plaintiff:
Michael Bowser
Defendant:
D. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Wang et al
as 7:2022cv00612
Plaintiff:
William Lee Anderson, II
Defendant:
Dr. Laurance Shu Chang Wang and Dr. Mark Amonette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bristol v. Anderson et al
as 7:2022cv00603
Plaintiff:
Telly Savalas Bristol
Defendant:
David Anderson, Dr. Olinger, Dr. Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
