Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Andre Johnson v. Edward Russ
as 20-30497
Defendant / Appellee:
Edward Russ
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andre Johnson
Clarence Jones v. M. Rojas, et al
as 19-35594
Defendant / Appellee:
J. HOLLOPETER, In his Official and Individual Corridor Officer on Complex Two at the Snake River Correctional Institution, BILL DOMAN, in his official and individual capacity as acting assistant superintendent of correctional rehabilitation and senior supervisor of law library services and M. Rojas and H. Mackenzie at the Snake River Correctional Institution, MARK NOOTH, in his individual and official capacity as eastside institution administrator of the Oregon Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE EUGENE JONES, AKA Charles J. Johnson, AKA Charles James Johnson, AKA Asmar H. Saleem, AKA Asmar Habeeb-Ullah Saleem
Diane Johnson, et al v. Deron Fulton, et al
as 19-12552
Defendant / Appellant:
DERON FULTON and JOHN BOWE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DIANE JOHNSON and ANDRE JOHNSON
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Johnson v. Fifth Third Bank
as 8:2017cv02735
Plaintiff:
Andre Johnson
Defendant:
Fifth Third Bank
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Andre Johnson v. David Baughman
as 2:2017cv07439
Respondent:
David Baughman
Petitioner:
Andre Johnson
Johnson v. Hunt et al
as 1:2014cv08986
Plaintiff:
Andre Johnson
Defendant:
Church of God in Christ, Incorporated and James W. Hunt, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Type:
Other Statutes
In re: Andre Johnson
as 14-3568
Movant:
In re: ANDRE JOHNSON
Respondent:
DAVE MARQUIS, Deputy Warden
USA v. Andre Johnson
as 12-6412
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANDRE JOHNSON
United States of America v. Andre Johnson
as 09-3312
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANDRE JOHNSON
United States of America v. Andre Johnson
as 09-3264
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANDRE JOHNSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
