Cases 1 - 10 of 3,163
NEUMAN v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv02092
Plaintiff:
ANDREW NEUMAN
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Peacock v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv03254
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Andrew Peacock
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hladky v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03053
Plaintiff:
Andrew Hladky
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jackson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01317
Plaintiff:
Andrew S. Jackson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Sprecher v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01440
Plaintiff:
Andrew Sprecher
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ANDREWS v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2023cv02202
Plaintiff:
CASSEY J. ANDREWS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Couch v. Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv14832
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Couch
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Anderson v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv01070
Plaintiff:
Andrew Anderson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stasinski v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv02404
Plaintiff:
Marcin Stasinski
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hankes v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv02196
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Hankes
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
