Cases 1 - 10 of 1,414
Peacock v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv03254
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Andrew Peacock
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sprecher v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01440
Plaintiff:
Andrew Sprecher
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Couch v. Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv14832
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Couch
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Anderson v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv01070
Plaintiff:
Andrew Anderson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hankes v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv02196
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Hankes
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kathleen Andrews v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 23-1176
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHLEEN MARY ANDREWS
Defendant / Appellee:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Buchanan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv02929
Plaintiff:
Andrew Buchanan
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv04473
Plaintiff:
Joseph Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WILLIAMS JR. v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv02098
Plaintiff:
TERRY D. WILLIAMS JR.
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HERNANDEZ v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv02020
Plaintiff:
JESSICA D. HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
