Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Wenger v. Chesapeake Urology, et al.
as 1:2023cv02094
Plaintiff:
Glenn Wenger
Defendant:
MD Andrew Harbin, Chesapeake Urology and Andrew C. Harbin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Curtin et al v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Company et al
as 1:2020cv00921
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Cyprus Amax Minerals Company and Avon Products, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Betty Ann Cartwright, Laura Elizabeth Curtin, Andrew C Curtin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kolbe et al v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2013cv02841
Plaintiff:
Associated Gun Clubs of Baltimore, Inc., Atlantic Guns, Inc., Matthew Godwin and others
Defendant:
Marcus L. Brown, Douglas F. Gansler, Maryland State Police and others
Amicus Curiae:
Pink Pistols, National Rifle Association of America, John Cutonilli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Direct Benefits, LLC, et al v. TAC Financial Inc., et al.
as 1:2013cv01185
Plaintiff:
Direct Benefits, LLC and Andrew C. Gellene
Defendant:
Roy H Eder, Rhett McNulty, Clark McNutly and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC v. Chapolini Associates, et al
as 1:2009cv02386
Plaintiff:
Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC
Defendant:
Chapolini Associates, 2010 Reservior Road Investors, LLC, Quad Partners Limited Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Gillen et al v. C-Bass Diamond LLC et al
as 1:2008cv00275
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Gillen, Thomas M. Gillen, John C. Kendall and others
Defendant:
C-Bass Diamond LLC and Credit-Based Asset Servicing and Securitization LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Gillen et al v. Goresh et al
as 1:2008cv00272
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Gillen, John C. Kendall, EDMUND J STUSH and others
Defendant:
Andrew C. Goresh, James T Hagan, Jr., PAMELA M ROHRER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
