Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Wetzel v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2013cv04741
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Wetzel
Defendant:
James LeBlanc
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wetzel v. Gamble et al
as 2:2013cv02485
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Wetzel
Defendant:
Matthew D. Gamble, Robert C Tanner, Michael Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wetzel v. Tanner et al
as 2:2013cv02487
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Wetzel
Defendant:
Robert C Tanner, Matthew David Gamble, James LeBlanc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wetzel v. Prince et al
as 3:2013cv00228
Defendant:
Howard Prince, Unknown E M T and Unknown Preacher
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Wetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wetzel v. Gamble et al
as 5:2013cv00757
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Wetzel
Defendant:
Matthew David Gamble, Robert C Tanner, Michael Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wetzel v. Gamble et al
as 3:2013cv00219
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Wetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wetzel v. Gamble et al
as 5:2013cv00698
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Wetzel
Defendant:
Robert C Tanner, Michael Harrell, Darryl Mizell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wetzel v. Gamble et al
as 5:2013cv00607
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Wetzel
Defendant:
Matthew David Gamble, Robert C Tanner, Michael Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wetzel v. Williams et al
as 5:2013cv00410
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Wetzel
Defendant:
Bryan Williams, Robert C Tanner, Keith Bickham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wetzel v. Tanner et al
as 5:2013cv00411
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Wetzel
Defendant:
Robert C Tanner, Keith Bickham, Michael Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
