Cases 1 - 10 of 142
Foster v. Kijakazi
as 3:2021cv00443
Plaintiff:
Clifton David Foster
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hamilton v. Saul
as 4:2021cv00088
Plaintiff:
Aimee D Hamilton
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Dennis v. Kijakazi
as 3:2021cv00427
Plaintiff:
Atonya L. Dennis
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Barnes-Baymon v. Saul
as 4:2021cv00079
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Toni L Barnes-Baymon
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Towns v. Saul
as 2:2021cv00326
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Christopher A Towns
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Fagan v. Saul
as 4:2021cv00070
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Craig A. Fagan
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Johnson v. Kijakazi
as 3:2021cv00342
Plaintiff:
Yvette Lee Johnson
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul and Kiolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Privott v. Saul
as 2:2021cv00288
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Tracey L. Privott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Teaters v. Saul
as 2:2021cv00282
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Teaters
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Giddens v. Saul
as 2:2021cv00275
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Rosalyn M Giddens
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
