Cases 81 - 90 of 175
Smith v. Cuomo et al
as 6:2016cv06081
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Smith
Defendant:
Andrew M. Cuomo, Cesar A Perales, Anthony T. Annucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Cuomo et al
as 9:2016cv00122
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Smith
Defendant:
Andrew M. Cuomo, Cesar A. Perales, Anthony T. Annucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Browne v. Hynes et al
as 1:2016cv00503
Plaintiff:
Kendall Browne
Defendant:
Hon. Andrew M. Cuomo, Charles J. Hynes, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel v. Annucci et al
as 1:2016cv00248
Plaintiff:
Dennis Daniel
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Andrew M. Cuomo and Thomas Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagley v. The State of New York et al
as 9:2015cv01357
Plaintiff:
William Bagley
Defendant:
The State of New York, George Pataki, Andrew M. Cuomo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bagley v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2015cv08691
Plaintiff:
William Bagley
Defendant:
The State of New York, George Pataki, Andrew M. Cuomo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2015cv08414
Plaintiff:
Echo Westley Dixon
Defendant:
The United States of America, The City of New York, New York City Police Department Precinct 44 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFadden v. Cuomo
as 1:2015cv06024
Petitioner:
Reginald McFadden
Respondent:
Andrew M. Cuomo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. NYSDOCS et al
as 1:2015cv00502
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones
Defendant:
NYSDOCS, Anthony J. Annucci, Andrew M. Cuomo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. NYSDOCS et al
as 1:2015cv04166
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones
Defendant:
NYSDOCS, Anthony J. Annucci, Andrew M. Cuomo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
