Cases 11 - 20 of 124
Harley v. Saul
as 1:2021cv10796
Plaintiff:
Mr. Stephen T Harley
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Conrad v. Saul
as 1:2021cv10788
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Melissa Conrad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Danielle D. v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00205
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Danielle Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Contreras
as 1:2021cv10768
Plaintiff:
Sharon Contreras and ANDREW SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Contreras v Saul
as 4:2021cv10768
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Sharon Contreras
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Pimentel v. US Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 1:2021cv00279
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew Saul and US Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Pimentel
Not Classified By Court:
US Social Security Administration - Notice Only (Court Use Only) and US Social Security Admin-Notice Only USA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Julia W. v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00132
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Julia Westall
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Kaylee M. v. saul
as 1:2021cv00135
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Commissioner SSA Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Kaylee Macallister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Daniele v. Saul
as 3:2021cv30031
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Gina Geraldina Daniele
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Deshaies v. Saul
as 1:2021cv10252
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Michael J Deshaies
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
