Cases 1 - 10 of 16
IN RE: ANDRUS
as 2:2022cv00912
Petitioner:
CRAIG M. ANDRUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BLANK ROME, LLP v. ANDRUS WAGSTAFF, P.C.
as 2:2019cv05909
Defendant:
ANDRUS WAGSTAFF, P.C.
Plaintiff:
BLANK ROME, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. GL LOGISTICS, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv04924
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
GL LOGISTICS, LLC, WAYNE D. HUET, PEGGY T. BURNETTE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Andrus v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv01976
Plaintiff:
Zane A. Andrus
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Farkas v. NRA Group LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00356
Plaintiff:
Jodie Farkas
Defendant:
NRA Group LLC, Zuliama Figueroa, Alonzo Hankerson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
ANDRUS v. BARD HOLDING INC et al
as 2:2013cv00661
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDRUS
Defendant:
BARD HOLDING INC, SURAJIT KHANNA and HOWARD L. BOBB
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 260 Wage Payment and Collection Law (WPCL)
Welsh v. Lebanon County Prison et al
as 1:2012cv01640
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee Welsh, Jr.
Defendant:
Lebanon County Prison and Andrue Enimpah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAYON et al v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60164
Plaintiff:
ANDRUS B. RAYON and MARION RUTH RAYON
Defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , FORTY-EIGHT INSULATION, INC. , H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANDRUS et al v. A C & S, INC et al
as 2:2011cv62239
Plaintiff:
CLEVELAND ANDRUS and MARY ANDRUS
Defendant:
A C & S, INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD IND., INC , CELOTEX CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
METOYER v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv62063
Plaintiff:
ANDRUS METOYER
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., KEENE CORPORATION, MINNESOTA MINING & MFG CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
