Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Johnson v. Nunez et al
as 2:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Alex Bernard Johnson
Defendant:
Juan J. Nunez, Jerry J. Sanchez, Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Nunez et al
as 1:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Alex Bernard Johnson
Defendant:
Juan J. Nunez, Jerry J. Sanchez, Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huerta-Calderon v. Lopez-Hernandez et al
as 3:2018cv00214
Defendant:
Miguel Angel Lopez-Hernandez and Transportes Lyrma De Ciudad Juarez, S.A. de C.V.
Plaintiff:
Hugo A. Huerta-Calderon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lopez-Ordonez v. United States of America
as 7:2016cv00062
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Lopez-Ordonez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Aguilar et al v. Harren & Partner Ship Management GmbH & Co KG
as 3:2015cv00298
Plaintiff:
Deiby Aguilar , Diego Alejandro , Daniel Dominguez Arevalo and others
Defendant:
Harren & Partner Ship Management GmbH & Co KG
Claimant:
Harren & Partner SUMO-Shipping GmbH & Co KG MS "PALMAROLA"
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Aguilar et al v. Friede & Goldman, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00207
Plaintiff:
Deiby Aguilar , Diego Alejandro , Daniel Dominguez Arevalo and others
Defendant:
Friede & Goldman, LLC, Friede & Goldman, Ltd., FG Engineering, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lopez et al v. Allis-Chalmers Energy Inc.
as 2:2011cv00353
Plaintiff:
Jose Angel Lopez and Michael James Lyons
Defendant:
Allis-Chalmers Energy Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
