Cases 1 - 10 of 17
The Estate of Ruth Ann Johnson et al v. Law Offices of David A. Sims, PLLC et al
as 3:2023cv00647
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Ruth Ann Johnson and Gary Harrison
Defendant:
Law Offices of David A. Sims, PLLC, David A. Sims, Morgan, Collins & Yeast, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Calvario et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv10794
Plaintiff:
Carmen Calvario , Connie Neeley , Shirley Wittman and others
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Doe Manufacturers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04808
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Le Ann Johnson
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Tissue Science Laboratories Limited, Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03400
Plaintiff:
Beverly Ann Johnson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv09968
Plaintiff:
Ann Johnson
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv08426
Plaintiff:
Paula Anne Johnson and Milton Kelly Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv07929
Plaintiff:
Julie Ann Johnson
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Johnson v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv07947
Plaintiff:
Priscilla Ann Johnson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv03366
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Johnson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv29576
Plaintiff:
Gloria Ann Johnson
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
