Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 63
ABC Services Group, Inc. v. Aetna Health and Life Insurance Company, et al
as 22-55631
Plaintiff / Appellant: ABC SERVICES GROUP, INC., in its capacity as assignee for the benefit of creditors for Morningside Recovery, LLC,
Defendant / Appellee: AETNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, ANTHEM BLUE CROSS LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY, ANTHEM, INC., DBA Anthem Health, Inc. and others
Type: Contract Insurance
Henderson, et al. v. Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc., et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00164
Plaintiff: Martha Henderson and Perry Merkel
Defendant: Anthem Health & Life Insurance Company, Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc, Anthem Life Insurance Company of California and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Olson v. Anthem Health Plans of Virginia, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00184
Plaintiff: Erin K Olson
Defendant: Anthem Health Plans of Virginia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Affeld Grivakes LLP v. David Castellani et al
as 2:2021cv09182
Plaintiff: Affeld Grivakes LLP
Defendant: David Castellani, Anthem Inc. dba Anthem Health, Inc., DOES 1 though 20, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In re Anthem, Inc. Data Breach Litigation
as 5:2015md02617
Plaintiff: Marissa Nasca, Nicholas Bowes, Gregory Burke and others
Defendant: Anthem Life Insurance Company, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Inc., Highmark Health Services and others
Appellant: Leona Boone
In Re: Anthem, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation
Not Classified By Court: Andrew Coddington, Kelly Kress, Adam Schulman and others
Petitioner: Jeffrey Walton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
California Behavioral Health, LLC et al v. Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2020cv02424
Defendant: BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA, BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATION, VIANT, INC., and others
Plaintiff: CALIFORNIA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC, WILLIAM W. MARTIN, PH.D., LICENSED CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST, ARTEMIS HILL RECOVERY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
JMG Investments, Inc. v. Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company et al
as 2:2020cv11514
Defendant: Blue Cross of California, The Anthem Companies, Inc., Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association and others
Plaintiff: JMG Investments, Inc dba Harmony Place, Inc. and JMG Investments, Inc. doing business as Harmony Place, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dual Diagnosis Treatment Center, Inc., et al. v. Blue Cross of California, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2015cv00736
Defendant: Blue Cross of California, Natures Path Foods, Inc. Welfare Benefit Plan, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Mutual Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: Dual Diagnosis Treatment Center, Inc, Dual Diagnosis Treatment Center, Inc., Medical Concierge, Inc. and others
Claimant: New York Unity Factor LLC and Charles Badder
Not Classified By Court: Delta-T Group Phoenix, Inc. and Last Chance Funding, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Halo Unlimited, Inc. v. Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2020cv00399
Defendant: Blue Cross of California, Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company, Anthem Health, Inc., an Indiana Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Halo Unlimited, Inc. and Halo Unlimited, Inc. a Nevada corporation doing business as Infant Hearing Screening Specialists
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Oscar Maldonado v. Empire HealthChoice Assurance, Inc., et al
as 2:2020cv01387
Defendant: EMPIRE HEALTHCHOICE ASSURANCE, INC. dba EMPIRE BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD, ANTHEM, INC., Anthem Health, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Oscar Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?