Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Gay v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv04220
Plaintiff: Anthony Gay
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Gay v. Keys et al
as 4:2020cv04250
Defendant: City of Rock Island, Mike Thoms, John Doe and others
Plaintiff: Anthony Gay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01133
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07196
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gay v. Ortman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv50310
Defendant: Jonathan Ortman, C/O Hart and C/O Andrew
Plaintiff: Anthony Gay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gay v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 1:2013cv01184
Plaintiff: Anthony Gay
Defendant: Wexford Health Sources Inc and . Tilden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gay v. Matthews et al
as 1:2012cv01517
Plaintiff: Anthony Gay
Defendant: . Matthews, . Van, Andrea Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gay v. Lambert We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01453
Petitioner: Anthony Gay
Respondent: Greg Lambert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gay v. Lambert We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01444
Petitioner: Anthony Gay
Respondent: Greg Lambert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gay v. Lambert
as 1:2012cv01460
Petitioner: Anthony Gay
Respondent: Greg Lambert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?