Cases 1 - 10 of 23
USA v. Anthony Johnson
as 22-3226
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY JOHNSON
Anthony Johnson v. State of Pennsylvania, et al
as 21-3359
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, Solicitor and others
Defendant:
MARK COPOULOS, doing business as Brucha Holdings Realty, DIANE CORTES, doing business as Brucha Holdings Realty, COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, doing business as Brucha Holdings Realty and others
Anthony JohnsonIn re: Anthony Johnson
as 21-3229
Petitioner:
In re: ANTHONY JOHNSON
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
USA v. Anthony Johnson, Jr.
as 21-1320
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY JOHNSON, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Anthony Johnson
as 20-3138
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY JOHNSON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Anthony Johnson
as 19-1683
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Petitioner:
In re: ANTHONY JOHNSON
In re: Anthony Johnson
as 18-1067
Petitioner:
In re: ANTHONY JOHNSON
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
In re: Anthony Johnson
as 17-1659
Petitioner:
In re: ANTHONY JOHNSON
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Eric Rambert, et al v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 16-4228
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
ERIC X. RAMBERT, ANTHONY JOHNSON, MICHAEL BUNDY and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, SECRETARY, SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, D. F. OBERLANDER, DSCS and others
Eric Rambert, et al v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 16-3778
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC X. RAMBERT
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
ANTHONY JOHNSON, MICHAEL BUNDY, JOHN PASSMORE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, JOHN E. WETZEL, SECRETARY, D. F. OBERLANDER, DSCS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
