Cases 61 - 70 of 224
Phillips v. Richmiller et al
as 3:2023cv03276
Plaintiff:
Glen Phillips
Defendant:
Jonathan Richmiller, Brittany P Greene, Andrew Manton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armour v. Dolce et al
as 3:2023cv03072
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Armour
Defendant:
Connie Dolce, Angie Crane, Dearmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vazquez v. Chausse et al
as 3:2023cv03050
Plaintiff:
Miguel Vazquez
Defendant:
J Chausse, Lt Hanks, Anthony Wills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oats v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv03037
Plaintiff:
Roderick S Oats, Jr
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, John Doe 1, C/O Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
French v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv02948
Plaintiff:
Marcellus A. French, Sr.
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Major Rowland, Joshua A. Schoenbeck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Wills
as 3:2023cv02890
Petitioner:
Blake O. Wilson
Respondent:
Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Croom v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv02885
Plaintiff:
Christopher Croom
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Rob Jeffreys and Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Wills
as 3:2023cv03256
Petitioner:
Antonio Phillips
Respondent:
Anthony Wills
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lipscomb v. Rice et al
as 3:2023cv02800
Plaintiff:
Keon V. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Rice, C/O Hampton, Anthony Wills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyons v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv02801
Plaintiff:
Martin Lyons
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Kevin Reichert, Sara McClure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
