Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Silva v. Moniz
as 21-1967
Petitioner / Appellant:
CARLOS MONTEIRO SILVA
Respondent / Appellee:
ANTONE MONIZ, Superintendent, Plymouth County Correctional Facility
Ireland v. Garland, et al
as 21-1728
Petitioner / Appellant:
OLIVER IRELAND
Respondent / Appellee:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General and ANTONE MONIZ, Superintendent, Plymouth County Jail
Peulic v. Moniz
as 20-1725
Respondent / Appellee:
ANTONE MONIZ, Superintendent of the Plymouth County Correctional Facility
Petitioner / Appellant:
IGOR PEULIC
Pereira Brito, et al v. Barr, et al
as 20-1119
Petitioner:
GILBERTO PEREIRA BRITO, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, FLORENTIN AVILA LUCAS, Individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and JACKY CELICOURT, Individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated
Interested Party:
JOHN A. HAWKINSON
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER BRACKETT, Superintendent of the Strafford County Department of Corrections, ANTONE MONIZ, Superintendent of the Plymouth County Correctional Facility, YOLANDA SMITH, Superintendent of the Suffolk County House of Corrections and others
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES MCHENRY, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, YOLANDA SMITH, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, LORI STREETER, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Pereira Brito, et al v. Barr, et al
as 20-1037
Respondent / Appellee:
ANTONE MONIZ, Superintendent of the Plymouth County Correctional Facility, CHRISTOPHER BRACKETT, Superintendent of the Strafford County Department of Corrections, LORI STREETER, Superintendent of the Franklin County House of Corrections and others
Interested Party:
JOHN A. HAWKINSON
Petitioner / Appellant:
JACKY CELICOURT, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, GILBERTO PEREIRA BRITO, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, FLORENTINE AVILA LUCAS, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
