Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Harold Jean-Baptiste v. United States Department of Justice, et al
as 23-14053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAROLD JEAN-BAPTISTE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS and others
Mobley-Weeks v. Gonzalez
as 8:2023cv02526
Plaintiff:
Aaron Ibraham Mobley-Weeks
Defendant:
Antonio Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GONZALEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv05921
Plaintiff:
MANUEL ANTONIO GONZALEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv24258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Movsas v. Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2022cv23794
Plaintiff:
Lisa Sharon Movsas
Defendant:
UR M JADDOU, Alejandro Marorkas, Alyssa Emmel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
GONZALEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20946
Plaintiff:
PATRICIO ANTONIO GONZALEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv20514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv80225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gonzalez v. CMRE Financial Services, Inc.
as 9:2022cv80199
Plaintiff:
Antonio Gonzalez
Defendant:
CMRE Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2021cv81901
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
