Cases 31 - 40 of 176
Dwyer et al v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2024cv01844
Plaintiff:
Richard Dwyer and Aimen Halim
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Schermer v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2024cv01815
Plaintiff:
Jared Schermer
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Collins et al v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2024cv01796
Plaintiff:
Deborah Collins, Hunter Collins, Henry Morales and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
GOLDFUS v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv04108
Plaintiff:
SHOSHI GOLDFUS
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv04055
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant:
APPLE, INC. and APPLE INC.
Petitioner:
PHV NICOLE DEMERS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
PHANTOMALERT v. APPLE INC.
as 1:2024cv00786
Plaintiff:
phantomALERT
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Coronavirus Reporter Corporation et al v. Apple Inc
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Coronavirus Reporter Corporation and Calid Inc
Defendant:
Apple Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Gamboa v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2024cv01270
Plaintiff:
Julianna Felix Gamboa
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Bakay et al v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Luisa Bakay, Elisa Jones and Leticia Shaw
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Mirage Wine + Spirits, Inc. v. Apple Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03942
Plaintiff:
Mirage Wine + Spirits, Inc. Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated doing business as Mirage Wine & Spirits
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Visa Inc. and Mastercard Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
