Cases 91 - 100 of 164
Emblaze Ltd v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2013mc00242
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Plaintiff:
Emblaze Ltd.
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Compel
Emblaze Ltd v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2013mc00195
Plaintiff:
L Emblaze Ltd
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Compel
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute et al v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2013cv00633
Plaintiff:
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and Dynamic Advances, LLC
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Apple Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Dynamic Advances, LLC and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Callet World, LLC v. August Hat Company Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02030
Plaintiff:
Callet World, LLC
Defendant:
August Hat Company Inc. and Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Epstein et al v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02105
Plaintiff:
David Aaron Epstein and Shani Porges
Defendant:
Apple, Inc., Barclays Bank Delaware, Equifax, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Levy v. Apple, Inc.
as 1:2013cv02028
Plaintiff:
Amanda U. Levy
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Epstein et al v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 7:2013cv02105
Plaintiff:
David Aaron Epstein and Shani Porges
Defendant:
Apple, Inc., Barclays Bank Delaware, Equifax, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
United States Of America v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2012mc00351
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Dynamic Advances, LLC v. Apple, Inc.
as 1:2012cv01579
Plaintiff:
Dynamic Advances, LLC
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Liewald v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv07566
Plaintiff:
Sabine Liewald
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. and Apple Computers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
