Cases 21 - 30 of 164
Scales v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 1:2022cv09683
Plaintiff:
William Scales
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cheikhaoui v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2022cv08855
Plaintiff:
Kamal Cheikhaoui
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Apple, Inc., Omniscient Investigations Corp. d/b/a OIC Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03287
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Germain v. Martin et al.
as 1:2022cv08337
Plaintiff:
Patrice Germain and Big Bizne$$ Music & Film Entertainment, LLC
Defendant:
Christopher Edward Martin, Gangstarr Enterprises LLC, To The Top and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Treanor v. Apple Inc. et al
as 7:2022cv07108
Plaintiff:
William Treanor
Defendant:
Apple Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
IbnTalal v. The Supreme Court of New York County et al
as 1:2022cv01476
Plaintiff:
Najma IbnTalal
Defendant:
The Supreme Court of New York County, The Town of Islip, Brentwood Free School District and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelley v. Morning Bee, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv08420
Plaintiff:
Michael Kelley
Defendant:
Morning Bee, Inc. and Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vivar v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2022cv00347
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Vivar
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
