Cases 61 - 70 of 90
S3 Graphics Co Ltd. v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2011cv00862
Plaintiff:
S3 Graphics Co Ltd.
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
VIA Technologies Inc. et al v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2011cv00857
Plaintiff:
VIA Technologies Inc. , IP-First LLC and Centaur Technology Inc.
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
FastVDO LLC v. Apple Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00797
Plaintiff:
FastVDO LLC
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Canon U.S.A. Inc. , Casio America Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
HTC Corporation v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2011cv00785
Plaintiff:
HTC Corporation
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2011cv00573
Plaintiff:
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America LLC
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Apple Inc. v. HTC Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv00611
Plaintiff:
Apple Inc.
Defendant:
HTC Corp. , HTC BVI Corp , HTC America Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
HTC America Holding Inc. , HTC America Inc. , HTC BVI Corp and others
Counter_defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nokia Corporation v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2009cv00791
Plaintiff:
Nokia Corporation
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nokia Corporation et al v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2011cv00259
Plaintiff:
Nokia Corporation and Intellisync Corporation
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Nokia Corporation v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2011cv00015
Plaintiff:
Nokia Corporation
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Apple Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Nokia Corporation and Nokia Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Walker Digital LLC v. Apple Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00363
Plaintiff:
Walker Digital LLC
Defendant:
Apple Inc. , Digimarc Corporation , Nielsen Company (US) LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
