Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Mackintosh v. Apple, Inc.
as 1:2022cv11547
Plaintiff:
Adam John Mackintosh
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cain et al v. Comcast et al
as 1:2019cv12344
Defendant:
Twitter, GM Financial, JMAC and others
Plaintiff:
Cristina Cain and Trina Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Zamor et al v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2018cv10704
Plaintiff:
Marie Zamor , Vladimir Janvier and Estate of Natacha Zamor
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rauseo et al v. Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 1:2017cv12026
Defendant:
Army Corps of Engineers, Christopher Barron, Marco Tammaro and others
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Rauseo and Apple Hill Neighbors Group
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Dawicki v. Universal Music Group et al
as 3:2017cv30137
Plaintiff:
David Stanley Dawicki
Defendant:
Universal Music Group, Sony Music Entertainment, Warner Elektra Atlantic Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv40153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Virnetx et al v. Apple Inc. et al
as 1:2014mc91276
Plaintiff:
Virnetx and Science Applications International Corporation
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Apple Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Science Applications International Corporation and VirnetX Inc.
Movant:
McDermott Will & Emery LLP , Toby Kusmer and Hasan Rashid
Christensen et al v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2014cv10100
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Plaintiff:
Adam Christensen , Jeffrey Scolnick and William Farrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Motorola Mobility LLC v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 1:2013mc91304
Plaintiff:
Motorola Mobility LLC
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Zikianda v. County of Albany et al
as 1:2013mc91225
Plaintiff:
Yodi Zikianda
Defendant:
County of Albany, Craig Apple, Corizon, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
