Cases 1 - 10 of 39
STERLING v. ADVENTURE AQUARIUM, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00390
Defendant:
ADVENTURE AQUARIUM, LLC , HERSCHEND FAMILY ENTERTAINMENT CORP., INC., SECURITAS SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SHARON STERLING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMART v. ARAMARK INC. et al
as 1:2014cv03007
Plaintiff:
SALAHUDDIN F. SMART
Defendant:
ARAMARK INC., JEFFREY BURRELL, CAMDEN COUNTY DEPT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2010cv05485
Plaintiff:
KASHIEF WHITE
Defendant:
ERIC TAYLOR, CHRISTOPHER FOSSLER, ANTHONY PIZZARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OLIPHANT v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2010cv03782
Plaintiff:
CLEVELAND OLIPHANT
Defendant:
ERIC TAYLOR, CHRISTOPHER FOSSLER, ANTHONY PIZZARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. ARAMARK INC. et al
as 2:2010cv03469
Plaintiff:
DURAN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
ARAMARK INC. and ARAMARK CO.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMIREZ v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2010cv03298
Plaintiff:
FREDDIE RAMIREZ
Defendant:
ERIC TAYLOR, CHRISTOPHER FOSSLER, ANTHONY PIZZARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALLACE v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2010cv03299
Plaintiff:
RONALD WALLACE
Defendant:
ERIC TAYLOR, CHRISTOPHER FOSSLER, ANTHONY PIZZARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2010cv03296
Plaintiff:
TYHEMM WILLIAMS
Defendant:
ERIC TAYLOR, CHRISTOPHER FOSSLER, ANTHONY PIZZARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASTELLAR v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2010cv03297
Plaintiff:
VICTOR CASTELLAR
Defendant:
ERIC TAYLOR, CHRISTOPHER FOSSLER, ANTHONY PIZZARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
