Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Fleming v. United States of America et al
as 4:2012cv00452
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Fleming
Defendant:
United States of America , Leslie Powers, The GEO Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Mitchell v. Aramark et al
as 2:2012cv01265
Plaintiff:
Valencia Mitchell
Defendant:
Transocean Offshore USA, Inc., GlobalSantaFe Drilling Company and Aramark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Kyoumijran v. ARAMARK Facility Services, LLC
as 4:2012cv01025
Plaintiff:
Antranik Kyoumijran
Defendant:
ARAMARK Facility Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gwynn v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 4:2011cv00714
Plaintiff:
Steven Gwynn
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation and ARAMARK Healthcare Support Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walter V. Micolta vs. Aramark US Offshore Services, LLC
as 3:2011cv00257
Plaintiff:
Walter Villegas Micolta
Defendant:
Aramark US Offshore Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Bell v. Nabors Drilling USA LP et al
as 4:2011cv01130
Plaintiff:
Josaiah Bell
Defendant:
Nabors Drilling USA LP , Chevron USA Inc and ARAMARK Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Camarillo v. Armark Corporation d/b/a Aramark US Offshore Division
as 3:2011cv00095
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Camarillo
Defendant:
Aramark US Offshore Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Kruegel v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
as 3:2010cv00836
Defendant:
Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
Plaintiff:
Richard E Kruegel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lagrone et al v. Aramark Corporation
as 2:2010cv00472
Plaintiff:
Brenda Lagrone and Cecil Lagrone
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Oliver v. SPARTAN OFFSHORE DRILLING, L.L.C. et al
as 6:2010cv01665
Defendant:
SPARTAN OFFSHORE DRILLING, L.L.C. and ARAMARK CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
John Jeffrey Oliver
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
