Cases 1 - 10 of 143
Stewart v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02596
Plaintiff:
Teba Stewart
Defendant:
ARAMARK Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lewis v. Idleburg et al
as 1:2023cv05353
Plaintiff:
Clyde Lewis
Defendant:
Sheriff John D. Idleburg, Chief Clouse, Deputy Chief Kalfas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travers v. Idleburg et al
as 1:2023cv04816
Plaintiff:
Rishon Travers
Defendant:
John D. Idleburg, Jahaira Lopez, Aramark Commissary/Food Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snowden v. Aramark Management, LLC
as 1:2023cv04735
Plaintiff:
Jaime Snowden
Defendant:
Aramark Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv50260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc. v Butterball LLC et al
as 1:2023cv04404
Plaintiff:
Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Butterball LLC, Cargill Inc, Cargill Protein North America and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
