Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Braun v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00753
Defendant:
ABC, Inc., ABC LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ABC, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kandi Brown and Kandi Braun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rochester City School District v. Aramark Educational Services, LLC
as 6:2017cv06572
Defendant:
Aramark Educational Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Rochester City School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lake v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel LLC
as 6:2015cv06016
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lake
Defendant:
Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McNeil et al v. Live Nation, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00733
Plaintiff:
Jason McNeil and Pamela McNeil
Defendant:
Live Nation, Inc., Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. , Live Nation MTours (U.S.A.), Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
CNL Income Darien Lake, LLC , Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. , Live Nation Concerts, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Aramark Sports and Entertainment Services, LLC , Craig M. Lawson and SMG Food and Beverage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Merges et al v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 6:2008cv06250
Plaintiff:
David R. Merges and Julie L. Merges
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation and Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
