Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Darvin v. Correctional Development Center/Male et al
as 3:2023cv00373
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Darvin
Defendant:
Correctional Development Center/Male, Aramark Food Services and Tennessee Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Aramark Food Service et al
as 2:2023cv02137
Plaintiff:
Christian Pitts
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service, Shelby County Sheriff Office, Wellpath Healthcare Provider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benson v. Oldham et al
as 2:2017cv02749
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
William Bill Oldham, Robert Moore, Greenleaf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2017cv02470
Plaintiff:
Donald Douglas
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, Bill Oldham and Aramark Food Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 3:2017cv01004
Plaintiff:
Donald Douglas
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, Bill Oldham and Aramark Food Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shannon v. Luttrell et al
as 2:2017cv02213
Plaintiff:
Wayne Shannon
Defendant:
Mark H. Luttrell, William J. Gupton, Jr., William Spears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cage v. Green et al
as 3:2017cv00513
Plaintiff:
Quinton A. Cage
Defendant:
(f/n/u) Green, James M. Holloway, Tony Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2016cv02567
Plaintiff:
Develle Johnson
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erby v. Luttrell et al
as 2:2016cv03020
Plaintiff:
Fred Erby
Defendant:
Mark H. Luttrell, William J. Gupton, Jr., William Spears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. Aramark Food Services et al
as 2:2015cv02824
Plaintiff:
Mario Marquette Myers
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services and Shirley Hayslett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
