Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Laura Pendergest-Holt, et al v. Certain Underwriters
as 10-20069
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LAURA PENDERGEST-HOLT, R. ALLEN STANFORD, GILBERT LOPEZ, JR. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S OF LONDON AND ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO.
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED POLICYHOLDERS
Celestine v. Arch Specialty Insurance Co et al
as 2:2009cv02222
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Celestine
Defendant:
Arch Specialty Insurance Co, C H 2 M Hill Constructors Inc, Fluor Enterprises Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Louding et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Corp et al
as 6:2009cv02200
Defendant:
Arch Specialty Insurance Co, Fluor Enterprises Inc, Lexington Insurance Co and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Louding, Sr and Arreiae Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London et al v. Stanford et al
as 3:2009cv02206
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London and others
Defendant:
R Allen Stanford, James M Davis, Laura Pendergest-Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Laura Pendergest-Holt v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London
as 4:2009cv03712
Plaintiff:
Laura Pendergest-Holt
Defendant:
Certian Underwriters at Lloyd's of London and Arch Specialty Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Six Flags Inc v. Westchester Surplus, et al
as 08-30476
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIX FLAGS INC
Defendant - Appellee:
WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE CO, a corporation, ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO, a corporation, GREAT LAKES REINSURANCE (UK) PLC, a puplic limited company and others
RODCO Worldwide Inc v. Arch Specialty Ins
as 07-30930
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODCO WORLDWIDE INC
Defendant - Appellee:
ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
