Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Galindo v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 4:2024cv03070
Plaintiff:
Jason Galindo
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company, Archer Daniels Midland Company, ADM Transportation Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Green Plains Trade Group LLC v. Archer Daniels Midland Company
as 8:2021cv00418
Plaintiff:
GREEN PLAINS TRADE GROUP LLC, GREEN PLAINS ATKINSON LLC, GREEN PLAINS BLUFFTON LLC and others
Defendant:
Archer Daniels Midland Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chaney v. Archer Daniels Midland Company et al
as 8:2021cv00403
Plaintiff:
Dwight Chaney
Defendant:
Archer Daniels Midland Company, Minnesota Corn Processors Inc, Archer-Daniels-Midlands Company and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc and Zurich American Insurance Company
3Rd Party Defendant:
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Green Plains Trade Group LLC et al v. Archer Daniels Midland Company
as 8:2020cv00279
Plaintiff:
Green Plains Hereford LLC, Green Plains Wood River LLC, Green Plains York LLC and others
Defendant:
Archer Daniels Midland Company
Archer Daniels Midland Company v. Shermco Industries, Inc.
as 8:2017cv00429
Plaintiff:
Archer Daniels Midland Company
Defendant:
Shermco Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv03192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Archer Daniels Midland Company v. Soucie
as 4:2008cv03215
Plaintiff:
Archer Daniels Midland Company
Defendant:
Paul Soucie
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Culp v. Archer-Daniels-Midlands Company et al
as 4:2008cv03197
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D. Culp and Jeffrey D. Culp
Defendant:
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and Jacobs Field Services North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
