Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Lantern Maritime Company v. Chembulk Trading II LLC
as 4:2019cv03385
Defendant:
Chembulk Trading II LLC and Chembulk Ocean Transport, LLC
Plaintiff:
Lantern Maritime Company
Garnishee:
Exxonmobile Chemical Interamerica Inc., Total Petrochemicals and Refining USA Inc., E D & F Man Liquid Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Fernandez v. Archer Daniels Midland Company
as 3:2017cv00309
Plaintiff:
John Fernandez
Defendant:
Archer Daniels Midland Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company v. M/V AZUR, her engines, boilers, tackle, appurtenances, etc., in rem
as 3:2016cv00341
Plaintiff:
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
Defendant:
M/V Azur
Claimant:
Azur Shipping Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company v. M/V Pacific Harmony et al
as 2:2016cv00367
Plaintiff:
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
Defendant:
M/V Pacific Harmony , Cloud Jet, Ltd., Istanbul Denizcilik Deniz Ve Taimacilii A and others
Cross_claimant:
M/V Pacific Harmony and Austral Asia Line Pte. Ltd.
Cross_defendant:
Cloud Jet, Ltd. and Istanbul Denizcilik Deniz Ve Taimacilii A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
David Dreibodt, et al v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc., et al
as 5:2016cv00011
Defendant:
Archer Daniels Midland Company, Bunge North America, Inc., Cargill Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
David Dreibodt and Ron Wetz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Property Damage (P.I
Archer Daniels Midland Company v. Bee Agricultural Company
as 2:2015cv00426
Plaintiff:
Archer Daniels Midland Company
Defendant:
Bee Agricultural Company
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Archer Daniels Midland Company v. Norna Shipping Corporation S.A.E.
as 4:2008cv02026
Plaintiff:
Archer Daniels Midland Company
Defendant:
Norna Shipping Corporation S.A.E.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
