Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Big D Oil Co v. Federal Express Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
Big D Oil Co
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation and Penny Marie Archibald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Scott v. Dawkins-Huft
as 1:2022cv01142
Plaintiff:
Matthew Archibald Scott
Defendant:
Teresa Dawkins-Huft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Clore v. Mentor Worldwide, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv00003
Plaintiff:
Caylee Clore
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide, LLC and Archibald S Miller, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Gilson v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00146
Plaintiff:
Shannon Archibald Gilson
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Tri-State Contractors, et al v. Kemmerer, WY, et al
as 13-8009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRI-STATE CONTRACTORS INC., a Wyoming Corporation, DEL BARTEL and DALE THURGOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
KEMMERER, WY, a Body Politic, DAVID FAGNANT, Individually and as Mayor, MIKE ARCHIBALD, Individually and as City Administrator and others
Seni v. Peterschmidt et al
as 1:2012cv00320
Defendant:
Paul Jacobs, Kurt J. Lauk, Stephen S. Kurtz and others
Plaintiff:
John Seni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bartel, et al v. Kemmerer City, et al
as 11-8057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEL BARTEL and DALE THURGOOD
Plaintiff:
TRI-STATE CONTRACTORS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
KEMMERER CITY, a body politic, MIKE ARCHIBALD, individually and as City Administrator, TONY TOMASSI, individually and as City Councilman and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-4027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Archibald v. Astrue
as 2:2010cv01035
Plaintiff:
Patricia Archibald
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
