Cases 1 - 9 of 9
A, et al v. Hyatt Corporation
as 1:2024cv03742
Plaintiff:
Z, A,, Carmit Archibald and Georges Archibald
Defendant:
Hyatt Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pi Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Archibald v. Kroger Limited Partnership I et al
as 2:2022cv02752
Plaintiff:
Linda Archibald
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I, The Kroger Co., JFE Franchising, Inc. d/b/a Snowfox and others
Not Classified By Court:
Jamita Swearengen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Archibald v. HESS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2021cv00220
Plaintiff:
Norris Archibald
Defendant:
Virgin Islands Industial Maintenance Corp., Hess Oil New York Corp., HESS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
C.M. v. Estate of Dr. Reginald Archibald et al
as 1:2020cv00751
Plaintiff:
C.M.
Defendant:
Estate of Dr. Reginald Archibald and Madison Square Boys and Girls Club
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t
P.N. v. Rockefeller Institute et al
as 1:2019cv10493
Defendant:
Rockefeller Institute, THE ESTATE OF DR. REGINALD ARCHIBALD, THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL and others
Plaintiff:
P. N.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
N.R. v. Estate of Dr. Reginald Archibald et al
as 1:2019cv07609
Defendant:
Rockefeller University Hospital, Rockefeller University, Estate of Reginald Archibald and others
Plaintiff:
N.R.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi
Doe v. Landmark School Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv11933
Defendant:
Does 1-5, Charles Harris, Archibald Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Archibald v. Singh et al
as 3:2018cv01101
Plaintiff:
Angela Archibald
Defendant:
Navdeep Singh and Orbit Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Archibald et al v. Singh et al
as 3:2017cv00848
Plaintiff:
James Archibald and Angela Archibald
Defendant:
Navdeep Singh and Orbit Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
